Abstract: Consumers and the Case for Labeling Genfoods
Since the mid-1990s, Argentina, Canada, and the United States have surreptitiously introduced genetically engineered food crops in their domestic as well as international markets. Despite the many health uncertainties surrounding these products, the aforementioned countries have not subjected their genfoods to either mandatory safety tests or labeling requirements. Consequently, consumers in these countries have not only been exposed to potentially unsafe food but they have also been unable to differentiate GE from non-GE foods, making it increasingly difficult for them to exercise food choices in accordance with their health, religion, morals, culture, and political views. This regulatory framework, in particular the anti-GE labeling policy, violates a myriad of ethical imperatives that place an onus upon governments to protect the integrity, autonomy, and health of consumers. Given the gravity of this violation, the author argues that the Miami Group countries should label products of agricultural biotechnology. |
